Graph-based comparison of executable objects
WebCiteSeerX — Graph-based comparison of executable objects CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): A method to construct an … http://actes.sstic.org/SSTIC05/Analyse_differentielle_de_binaires/SSTIC05-article-Flake-Graph_based_comparison_of_Executable_Objects.pdf
Graph-based comparison of executable objects
Did you know?
WebThe general idea of the presented approach is the following : Given two exe-cutables, the graphs A and B are constructed. Then a number of ”fixedpoints” in the two graphs are … WebOct 8, 2004 · The talk will explain the concepts behind SABRE BinDiff, a tool that uses a graph-theoretical approach to compare two executable objects. Different applications for such a comparison technique will be discussed, ranging from the analysis of security …
WebWhenever the word ”graph” is used in this paper, it refers to a possibly cyclic directed graph consisting of a set of nodes and a set of edges. A simple capital letter is used to denote a … Webthe common drawbacks of any static-based approaches. For example, gener-ating a graph from a packed executable does not re ect the real structure of the code at all. In addition to the type of analysis, the scalability of these approaches is also a ected by the employed graph comparison algorithm. Full graph comparison ii
WebStructural Comparison of Executable Objects 163 3.1 An executable as Graph of Graphs We analyze the executable by regarding it as a graph of graphs. This means … WebStructural Comparison of Executable Objects July 2004 Authors: Thomas Dullien optimyze.cloud AG Abstract and Figures A method to heuristically construct an …
WebOct 23, 2012 · A Method for Resilient Graph-based Comparison of Executable Objects Joonhyouk Jang Department of Computer Science and Engineering Seoul National …
WebJul 31, 2024 · Figure 14: View Function Call Graph To dive into the function FUN_00406a29, click on the function label with that name and view the Listing or Decompile windows. Alternatively, click on the Listing or Decompile view, press the “g” key, type the function label name or address, then click “OK” to jump to the code. how big is mcagccWebblocks as graph (of a very simple form) again, and construct an isomorphism in. much the same manner. 4.1 Selectors. A Selector is essentially just a mapping that, given a node … how big is mcdonald\u0027s companyWebGraph-based comparison of Executable Objects (English Version) Thomas Dullien 1 and Rolf Rolles 2 1 Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum [email protected] 2 University of Technology in Florida [email protected] R´ esum´ e A method to construct an optimal isomorphism between the sets of instructions, sets of basic blocks and sets of functions in two differing but … how many oscars has michael b jordan wonWebTo perform the non-string based comparison techniques mentioned in section II (i.e. all but the system by Tian et al.), we first need to construct the CFGs of all of the functions in the executable objects in question. This requires disassembling the objects and using knowledge of the instruction set and how big is massachusettsWebOct 22, 2014 · Abstract: A method to heuristically construct an isomorphism between the sets of functions in two similar but differing versions of the same executable file is presented. Such an isomorphism has multiple practical applications, specifically the ability to detect programmatic changes between the two executable versions. how big is mcas new riverWebThe call graph, which presents the calling relationships between functions, is a useful representation of a program that can aid understanding. For programs that do not use function pointers, the call graph can be extracted simply by parsing the program. However, for programs that use function pointers, call graph extraction is nontrivial. how big is mazatlan mexicoWebStructural Comparison of Executable Objects 163 3.1 An executable as Graph of Graphs We analyze the executable by regarding it as a graph of graphs. This means that our executable consists of a set of functions F:= {f1,...,f n}. They correspond to the dis-assembly of the functions as defined in the original C sourcecode. The callgraph of the how many oscars has katharine hepburn won